THA Regulatory Hub
Region: APAC
APAC governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Bank of Thailand
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Securities and Exchange Commission Thailand
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Cross-sector data controllers and processors
National Cyber Security Agency
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure, Public and private organisations
Personal Data Protection Committee
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Institution Supervision FrameworkBOT | Banks and financial institutions supervised by BOT | Board governance, risk appetite, internal controls, operational risk, technology resilience and supervisory remediation. |
 Primary fit Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting.  Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Corporate Governance CodeSEC | Thai listed companies and boards applying the code | Board duties, risk governance, internal controls, audit oversight, disclosure and long-term accountability. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Cybersecurity Act B.E. 2562NCSA | Critical information infrastructure organisations and other entities within scope | Risk management, security measures, incident response, regulatory coordination, continuity and assessment. |
 Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Primary fit Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562PDPC | Data controllers and processors within scope | Privacy governance, processing records, security controls, processor oversight, breach notification and remediation. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Regulatory Coordination on Personal Data ProtectionSEC and PDPC | Capital-market operators handling personal data | Coordinated privacy governance, sector supervision, issue escalation and practical alignment with the PDPA. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
