PHL Regulatory Hub
Region: APAC
APAC governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Securities and Exchange Commission
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
National Privacy Commission
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Department of Information and Communications Technology
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure, Public and private organisations
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual of Regulations for BanksBSP | Banks and other BSP-supervised financial institutions within the applicable provisions | Corporate governance, risk appetite, enterprise risk management, internal controls, compliance, internal audit, board reporting and tracked remediation. |
 Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Information Technology Risk Management StandardsBSP | BSP-supervised financial institutions within the standards’ scope | Technology governance, cybersecurity, outsourcing, continuity, incident recording, escalation, recovery testing and independent assurance. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Code of Corporate Governance for Public Companies and Registered IssuersSEC | Public companies and registered issuers within the Code’s scope | Board and committee accountability, risk oversight, internal-control review, internal audit, disclosure and corrective-action monitoring. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Data Privacy Act Implementing Rules and RegulationsNPC | Personal-information controllers and processors within scope | Privacy governance, security measures, processor oversight, breach assessment, documentation, notification and remediation evidence. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Personal Data Breach Reporting ProceduresNPC | Personal-information controllers subject to breach-notification duties | Breach recording, risk assessment, regulatory escalation, affected-person communication, root-cause analysis and corrective actions. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Primary fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| National Cybersecurity Plan 2023 to 2028DICT | Government, critical infrastructure and participating organisations across the national cyber ecosystem | Cyber-risk governance, resilience, coordinated incident response, information sharing, capability assurance and service continuity. |
Primary fit Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
