POL Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Polish Financial Supervision Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
National Bank of Poland
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Personal Data Protection Office
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Computer Security Incident Response Team operated by NASK
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principles of Corporate Governance for Supervised InstitutionsKNF | Financial institutions supervised by KNF within the principles’ scope | Management and supervisory-board responsibilities, risk governance, internal controls, compliance, internal audit and transparent reporting. |
 Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Recommendation D on Information Technology and ICT Environment SecurityKNF | Banks operating within the recommendation’s scope | ICT strategy, security governance, risk assessment, outsourcing, continuity, incident response, monitoring and independent assurance. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up.  Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union and KNF | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk governance, major incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party registers, recovery and management-body accountability. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| National Cybersecurity System Act, 2026 AmendmentMinistry of Digital Affairs and national CSIRTs | Essential and important entities within the amended national regime | Information-security management, incident reporting to CSIRTs, accountable contacts, cybersecurity audits and documented remediation. |
Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Supporting fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| GDPR Personal Data Breach NotificationUODO | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the GDPR’s scope | Breach logging, risk assessment, notification without undue delay, affected-person communication, root-cause analysis and corrective action. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Primary fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
