TUR Regulatory Hub
Region: Middle East / Europe
Middle East / Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Capital Markets Board
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
Personal Data Protection Authority
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
National Cyber Incidents Response Center
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banking Law No. 5411BRSA | Banks and other institutions within the Law’s scope | Internal control, risk management, internal audit systems, consolidated oversight and governance responsibilities. |
 Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up.  Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Regulation on Information Systems and Electronic Banking ServicesBRSA | Banks operating in Turkey | Information-systems governance, risk controls, continuity, third-party services, security events, monitoring and electronic-banking resilience. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Communique on Corporate Governance II-17.1CMB | Publicly held companies within the Communique’s applicable scope | Board and committee governance, internal control and audit oversight, risk management, disclosure and accountable follow-up. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698KVKK | Data controllers and processors within scope | Data-security measures, controller accountability, internal audits and notification when data is obtained unlawfully. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Board Decision No. 2019/10 on Breach NotificationKVKK | Data controllers, including relevant overseas controllers | 72-hour Board notification, affected-person communication, breach documentation, response plans and accountable ownership. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
