IND Regulatory Hub
Region: South Asia
South Asia governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Reserve Bank of India
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
Indian Computer Emergency Response Team
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology
Industries Regulated
Telecommunications and digital services
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Banks Cybersecurity, Technology Risk, Resilience and Assurance Directions 2026RBI | Commercial banks within the Directions’ stated scope | Board technology governance, cyber and technology risk, resilience, third-party controls, incident management, independent assurance and regulatory reporting. |
 Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail.  Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Guidance Note on Operational Risk Management and Operational Resilience 2024RBI | RBI-regulated entities within the guidance perimeter | Risk appetite, critical operations, dependency mapping, incidents, tolerances, scenario testing, third-party risk and board reporting. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework 2024SEBI | SEBI-regulated entities | Cyber governance, risk assessment, security operations, incident response, regulatory reporting, recovery and audit evidence. |
Primary fit Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements RegulationsSEBI | Listed entities within the regulations’ scope | Board and audit-committee oversight, risk-management committees, internal controls, disclosures and corrective-action accountability. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Digital Personal Data Protection FrameworkMeitY | Data fiduciaries and processors within the enacted framework | Processing accountability, security safeguards, breach response, processor oversight and evidence supporting regulatory notifications. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
