IDN Regulatory Hub
Region: APAC
APAC governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Financial Services Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Bank Indonesia
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
National Cyber and Crypto Agency
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure
Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OJK Risk Management Requirements for Commercial BanksOJK | Commercial banks and banking groups within scope | Risk governance, appetite and limits, control functions, monitoring, risk reporting and independent review. |
 Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up.  Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| OJK Governance Requirements for Commercial BanksOJK | Commercial banks operating in Indonesia | Board and committee governance, internal controls, compliance, internal audit, conflicts and corrective follow-up. |
Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. Supporting fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| POJK 34/2025 on Information Technology ImplementationOJK | Rural banks and Sharia rural banks within the regulation’s scope | IT governance, digital security, incident response, third-party services, business continuity, control testing and assurance. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up.  Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| POJK 3/2024 on Financial-Sector Technology InnovationOJK | Financial-sector technology innovation providers within scope | Risk management, governance, consumer data, incident handling, supervisory reporting and service-provider controls. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Personal Data Protection Law No. 27 of 2022Komdigi | Personal-data controllers and processors within scope | Data governance, impact assessment, security, breach notification, processor oversight and accountability records. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
