RUS Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Bank of Russia
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Capital markets and listed companies
Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media
Industries Regulated
Telecommunications and digital services
Federal Service for Technical and Export Control
Industries Regulated
Government, critical infrastructure and regulated information-security activities
National Coordination Center for Computer Incidents
Industries Regulated
Government, critical infrastructure and cyber-incident response participants
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation 242-P on Internal Control in Credit InstitutionsCBR | Credit institutions and banking groups within scope | Internal-control systems, compliance, independent internal audit, control reporting, findings, escalation and corrective-action tracking. |
 Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up.  Primary fit Incident reporting, triage, investigation, root cause, corrective action, escalation and closure. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Ordinance 3624-U on Risk and Capital ManagementCBR | Credit institutions and banking groups within scope | Risk strategy, appetite, material-risk identification, limits, capital planning, monitoring, reporting and independent assessment. |
 Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Regulation 716-P on Operational Risk ManagementCBR | Credit institutions and banking groups within scope | Operational-risk classification, event databases, assessment, controls, key indicators, scenario analysis, reporting and remediation. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Corporate Governance Code and Public-Company RecommendationsCBR | Russian public joint-stock companies and other adopting issuers | Board and committee oversight, risk management, internal controls, internal audit, governance evaluation and transparent reporting. |
Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Federal Law 152-FZ Personal Data Incident ReportingRoskomnadzor | Personal-data operators within the Law’s scope | Incident recording, initial regulatory notification, investigation updates, cause analysis, response measures and evidence retention. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
