DEU Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Federal Financial Supervisory Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking, insurance, payments, capital markets and regulated financial services
Deutsche Bundesbank
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Federal Office for Information Security
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure, Public and private organisations
Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Requirements for Risk Management, MaRisk, Circular 06/2024BaFin | Credit and financial-services institutions within the circular’s scope | Risk strategy, appetite, internal controls, risk controlling, compliance, internal audit, outsourcing, continuity and board reporting. |
 Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| German Corporate Governance CodeGovernment Commission on the German Corporate Governance Code | German listed companies on an apply-and-explain basis | Management and supervisory-board oversight, internal controls, risk management, audit committee responsibilities and transparent reporting. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union and BaFin | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk governance, incident classification and reporting, resilience testing, third-party risk, recovery and management-body oversight. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| BSI Act and Critical-Infrastructure Incident ReportingBSI | Critical-infrastructure operators and other regulated organisations within national cybersecurity law | State-of-the-art security, significant-incident notification, response coordination, evidence retention and resilience improvement. |
Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| General Data Protection RegulationBfDI and German state data-protection authorities | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the GDPR’s scope | Accountability, security controls, processor oversight, breach assessment, 72-hour notification where required and corrective action. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
