ESP Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Banco de España
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
National Securities Market Commission
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
Spanish Data Protection Agency
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
National Cybersecurity Institute of Spain
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law 10/2014 and Royal Decree 84/2015 on Credit InstitutionsSpanish Government and BdE | Credit institutions operating within the Spanish prudential regime | Governance, risk management, internal controls, remuneration, supervisory reporting, recovery and accountable management. |
 Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting.  Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Circular 2/2016 on Supervision and SolvencyBdE | Credit institutions within the circular’s scope | Risk governance, capital and liquidity controls, internal processes, reporting, supervisory review and remediation evidence. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow, control and evidence support only. The platforms do not calculate regulatory capital, liquidity or prudential ratios. |
Source |
| Good Governance Code of Listed CompaniesCNMV | Spanish listed companies on a comply-or-explain basis | Board risk oversight, control functions, audit committees, internal audit, reporting and governance accountability. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union and Spanish financial supervisors | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk governance, major incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party controls, recovery and management-body oversight. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| GDPR Personal Data Breach NotificationAEPD | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the GDPR’s scope | Incident documentation, risk assessment, 72-hour notification where required, affected-person communication and corrective actions. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
