COD Regulatory Hub
Region: Africa
Africa governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Central Bank of the Congo
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech, Public and private organisations, Regulated financial services
Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of the Congo
Industries Regulated
Telecommunications and digital services
National Cybersecurity Agency
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction 17 on Internal ControlBCC | Credit institutions and financial companies within scope | Permanent controls, compliance, internal audit, operational incidents, reporting, findings and corrective actions. |
 Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up.  Primary fit Incident reporting, triage, investigation, root cause, corrective action, escalation and closure. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Instruction 21 on Corporate GovernanceBCC | Credit institutions supervised by BCC | Board and committee responsibilities, control functions, conflicts, risk oversight and governance reporting. |
 Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Instruction 22 on Risk ManagementBCC | Credit institutions and financial companies within scope | Risk strategy, appetite, identification, measurement, limits, monitoring, reporting and independent review. |
Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Instruction 14 on Prudential Management StandardsBCC | Banks and supervised financial institutions | Prudential limits, solvency and liquidity controls, reporting, escalation and supervisory remediation. |
Supporting fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow, control and evidence support only. The platforms do not calculate regulatory capital, liquidity or prudential ratios. |
Source |
| Law No. 18/019 on Payment and Securities Settlement SystemsBCC | Payment-system operators, participants and regulated payment services | System governance, operational security, continuity, incident response, settlement controls and oversight reporting. |
Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
