FRA Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Prudential Supervision and Resolution Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech
Financial Markets Authority
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
National Cybersecurity Agency of France
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure, Public and private organisations
National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors, Telecommunications and digital services
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order of 3 November 2014 on Internal ControlFrench Government and ACPR | Banking, payment and investment entities within the Order’s scope | Risk measurement, limits, permanent and periodic controls, internal audit, incident records, outsourcing, continuity and management reporting. |
 Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up.  Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| AMF General RegulationAMF | Issuers, investment firms, asset managers and other market participants within applicable provisions | Compliance, internal controls, risk management, conflicts, reporting, control evidence and supervisory remediation. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union and French financial supervisors | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk, major incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party registers, recovery and management-body oversight. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| EBIOS Risk Manager MethodANSSI | Organisations using the national method to manage digital risk | Risk scenarios, threat analysis, security objectives, treatment plans, monitoring and governance evidence. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| GDPR and Personal Data Breach NotificationCNIL | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the GDPR’s scope | Privacy accountability, incident assessment, 72-hour notification where required, affected-person communication and remediation records. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
