BTN Regulatory Hub
Region: South Asia
South Asia governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Cross-sector data controllers and processors, Regulated financial services
Government Technology Agency
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure
Bhutan Computer Incident Response Team
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Governance Rules and Regulations 2024RMA | Financial service providers within scope | Board and committee responsibilities, risk oversight, internal controls, internal audit, conflicts and governance reporting. |
 Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Risk Management Guidelines 2019RMA | RMA-regulated financial service providers | Risk appetite, identification, assessment, limits, controls, monitoring, reporting and independent review. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Business Continuity Planning Guidelines 2022RMA | Financial service providers within the guideline’s scope | Business-impact analysis, recovery priorities, crisis response, testing, third-party dependencies and improvement actions. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Cybersecurity Directives for BanksRMA | Banks supervised by RMA | Cyber governance, risk controls, monitoring, incident response, continuity, regulatory reporting and audit. |
Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Primary fit Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Guidelines on Data Privacy and Data Protection 2021RMA | Financial service providers handling customer and personal data | Privacy governance, access controls, processing accountability, data incidents, retention and assurance. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
