ITA Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Bank of Italy
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech
National Commission for Companies and the Stock Exchange
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
National Cybersecurity Agency
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
Italian Data Protection Authority
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supervisory Provisions for Banks, Circular 285BdI | Banks and banking groups within the circular’s scope | Corporate governance, risk appetite, internal controls, risk management, internal audit, information systems, continuity and supervisory reporting. |
 Primary fit Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Cybersecurity and Operational-Resilience Regulatory FrameworkBdI | Banks, payment institutions and other supervised entities within applicable provisions | ICT governance, continuity, cyber incidents, regulatory reporting, resilience testing, outsourcing and audit evidence. |
 Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union, BdI and CONSOB | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk governance, incident reporting, testing, third-party risk, recovery and management-body accountability. |
Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Italian Corporate Governance CodeCorporate Governance Committee and Borsa Italiana | Italian listed companies adopting the Code | Board oversight, internal-control and risk-management systems, audit committee functions, internal audit and governance disclosure. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| GDPR and Personal Data Protection CodeGarante | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the Italian regime | Data governance, security, processor oversight, breach assessment, regulatory notification, response and corrective action. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Supporting fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
