CHE Regulatory Hub
Region: Europe
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Insurance
SIX Exchange Regulation
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
National Cyber Security Centre
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
Supervisory Priorities
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
Regulatory Alignment
Official-source and product-fit review completed 1 September 2026.
The platform directly manages a central process or evidence set described in the requirement.
The platform contributes linked evidence, oversight or follow-up but is not the main system for the requirement.
A weak or unsubstantiated product relationship is intentionally omitted.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINMA Circular 2023/1 Operational Risks and ResilienceFINMA | Banks and other supervised institutions within the circular’s scope | Operational-risk management, critical functions, resilience tolerances, business continuity, incident management, outsourcing and reporting. |
 Primary fit Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting.  Primary fit Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| FINMA Corporate Governance CircularsFINMA | Banks and insurers within the relevant circulars’ scope | Board responsibilities, risk appetite, internal controls, compliance, internal audit independence and governance reporting. |
Primary fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting.  Primary fit Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Directive on Information Relating to Corporate GovernanceSER | Issuers subject to SIX listing rules | Transparent governance disclosure, board and committee structures, control mechanisms, audit information and accountability. |
Supporting fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Supporting fit Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Mandatory Cyber-Incident Notification for Critical InfrastructureNCSC | Critical-infrastructure operators within the national notification regime | Critical-incident assessment, timely reporting, response coordination, service recovery and documented follow-up. |
Primary fit Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Supporting fit Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
| Federal Act on Data Protection, Article 24 Breach NotificationFDPIC | Controllers handling personal data within the FADP’s scope | High-risk breach assessment, regulatory notification, data-subject communication, response documentation and corrective action. |
Primary fit Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Primary fit Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.
Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.
Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.
Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Scope boundary
Connected Operating Model
Structure local requirements by entity, licence, authority and accountable owner.
Link obligations to risks, controls, incidents, tests, findings and remediation.
Track KRIs, control status, audit coverage, incidents and action closure continuously.
Regional Coverage
Delaware, United States
Karachi, Pakistan
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
