MMA
Maldives Monetary Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Region: South Asia
The Maldives Monetary Authority leads banking and payment supervision, while the Capital Market Development Authority sets securities governance expectations. Regulated firms need a defensible operating record for risk, controls, assurance, continuity and cyber incidents.
South Asia governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Maldives Monetary Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Capital Market Development Authority
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
National Centre for Information Technology
Industries Regulated
Telecommunications and digital services, Public and private organisations
National Cybersecurity Centre
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure, Public and private organisations
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
01Each row translates an official regulatory source into an operational GRC focus, then identifies only the platforms with a defensible workflow or evidence role.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banking Act and Banking RegulationsMMA | Banks licensed and supervised by MMA | Governance, risk management, internal controls, supervisory reporting, examinations and corrective measures. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Prudential Regulation for BanksMMA | Licensed banks operating in the Maldives | Capital and liquidity controls, credit and operational risk, concentration, control monitoring and board reporting. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow, control and evidence support only. The platforms do not calculate regulatory capital, liquidity or prudential ratios. |
Source |
| Corporate Governance CodeCMDA | Listed companies and capital-market entities within scope | Board accountability, audit committees, internal controls, risk management, disclosure and independent assurance. |
Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Capital-Market Regulatory Rules and GuidelinesCMDA | Securities issuers, intermediaries and other regulated market participants | Governance, compliance controls, record keeping, supervisory reporting and remediation of findings. |
Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| National Cybersecurity FrameworkNCC and NCIT | Public bodies, critical services and participating organisations | Cyber-risk governance, incident coordination, continuity, response and improvement tracking. |
Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
Brochure-Validated Capability
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.

Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.

Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.

Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
The platforms support governance workflows, accountability, evidence and reporting. They do not calculate regulatory capital or liquidity, replace technical cybersecurity monitoring, provide legal interpretation, issue external-audit opinions or automatically file statutory notifications unless an approved integration and process are configured.
Use one traceable workflow to translate requirements, manage execution and demonstrate oversight.
01

