ACPR
Prudential Supervision and Resolution Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech
Region: Europe
France combines ACPR prudential oversight, AMF capital-market supervision, European digital-resilience requirements, ANSSI cybersecurity methods and CNIL privacy enforcement. Firms need a consistent operating record for risk, controls, incidents, assurance and executive reporting.
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Prudential Supervision and Resolution Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech
Financial Markets Authority
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
National Cybersecurity Agency of France
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure, Public and private organisations
National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors, Telecommunications and digital services
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
01Each row translates an official regulatory source into an operational GRC focus, then identifies only the platforms with a defensible workflow or evidence role.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order of 3 November 2014 on Internal ControlFrench Government and ACPR | Banking, payment and investment entities within the Order’s scope | Risk measurement, limits, permanent and periodic controls, internal audit, incident records, outsourcing, continuity and management reporting. |
Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| AMF General RegulationAMF | Issuers, investment firms, asset managers and other market participants within applicable provisions | Compliance, internal controls, risk management, conflicts, reporting, control evidence and supervisory remediation. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union and French financial supervisors | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk, major incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party registers, recovery and management-body oversight. |
Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| EBIOS Risk Manager MethodANSSI | Organisations using the national method to manage digital risk | Risk scenarios, threat analysis, security objectives, treatment plans, monitoring and governance evidence. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| GDPR and Personal Data Breach NotificationCNIL | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the GDPR’s scope | Privacy accountability, incident assessment, 72-hour notification where required, affected-person communication and remediation records. |
Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
Brochure-Validated Capability
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.

Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.

Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.

Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
The platforms support governance workflows, accountability, evidence and reporting. They do not calculate regulatory capital or liquidity, replace technical cybersecurity monitoring, provide legal interpretation, issue external-audit opinions or automatically file statutory notifications unless an approved integration and process are configured.
Use one traceable workflow to translate requirements, manage execution and demonstrate oversight.
01

