OJK
Financial Services Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Region: APAC
Indonesia’s financial-services regime combines OJK risk-management and governance requirements with technology controls and national personal-data protection. Firms need connected evidence for board accountability, internal controls, audit coverage, digital incidents and remediation.
APAC governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Financial Services Authority
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Bank Indonesia
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
National Cyber and Crypto Agency
Industries Regulated
Government and critical infrastructure
Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
01Each row translates an official regulatory source into an operational GRC focus, then identifies only the platforms with a defensible workflow or evidence role.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OJK Risk Management Requirements for Commercial BanksOJK | Commercial banks and banking groups within scope | Risk governance, appetite and limits, control functions, monitoring, risk reporting and independent review. |
Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| OJK Governance Requirements for Commercial BanksOJK | Commercial banks operating in Indonesia | Board and committee governance, internal controls, compliance, internal audit, conflicts and corrective follow-up. |
Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| POJK 34/2025 on Information Technology ImplementationOJK | Rural banks and Sharia rural banks within the regulation’s scope | IT governance, digital security, incident response, third-party services, business continuity, control testing and assurance. |
Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| POJK 3/2024 on Financial-Sector Technology InnovationOJK | Financial-sector technology innovation providers within scope | Risk management, governance, consumer data, incident handling, supervisory reporting and service-provider controls. |
Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Personal Data Protection Law No. 27 of 2022Komdigi | Personal-data controllers and processors within scope | Data governance, impact assessment, security, breach notification, processor oversight and accountability records. |
Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
Brochure-Validated Capability
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.

Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.

Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.

Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
The platforms support governance workflows, accountability, evidence and reporting. They do not calculate regulatory capital or liquidity, replace technical cybersecurity monitoring, provide legal interpretation, issue external-audit opinions or automatically file statutory notifications unless an approved integration and process are configured.
Use one traceable workflow to translate requirements, manage execution and demonstrate oversight.
01

