DAB
Da Afghanistan Bank
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Public and private organisations, Regulated financial services
Region: South Asia
Afghanistan’s formal banking framework is led by Da Afghanistan Bank and includes risk-management, fitness, external-audit and related-party requirements. Banks need documented governance, risk decisions, independent assurance, findings and corrective actions suited to current supervisory expectations.
South Asia governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Da Afghanistan Bank
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Public and private organisations, Regulated financial services
Financial Supervision Department of Da Afghanistan Bank
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
National Cyber Security Response Center
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
01Each row translates an official regulatory source into an operational GRC focus, then identifies only the platforms with a defensible workflow or evidence role.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guiding Principles of Risk ManagementDAB | Banks and financial institutions supervised by DAB | Risk governance, policies, risk identification, measurement, limits, control activities, reporting and board oversight. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Fit and Proper RegulationDAB | Shareholders, directors and senior officers of banking organisations within scope | Suitability assessment, conflicts, accountability, approvals, records and ongoing monitoring of responsible persons. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| External Audit RegulationDAB | Banks and their approved external auditors | Auditor independence, audit scope, reporting, findings, supervisory access and follow-up of corrective measures. |
Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Related Persons RegulationDAB | Banks and persons related to banks within the regulation’s scope | Conflict governance, exposure limits, approvals, monitoring, reporting and independent control over related transactions. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
Brochure-Validated Capability
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.

Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.

Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.

Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
The platforms support governance workflows, accountability, evidence and reporting. They do not calculate regulatory capital or liquidity, replace technical cybersecurity monitoring, provide legal interpretation, issue external-audit opinions or automatically file statutory notifications unless an approved integration and process are configured.
Use one traceable workflow to translate requirements, manage execution and demonstrate oversight.
01

