DNB
De Nederlandsche Bank
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech
Region: Europe
The Netherlands combines DNB prudential supervision, AFM conduct and governance oversight, European digital resilience and Dutch data-protection enforcement. Firms need clear governance, secure operations, controlled outsourcing, incident evidence and independent assurance.
Europe governance, risk and compliance intelligence
De Nederlandsche Bank
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Payments and fintech
Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending
Dutch Data Protection Authority
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
National Cyber Security Centre Netherlands
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies, Government and critical infrastructure
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
01Each row translates an official regulatory source into an operational GRC focus, then identifies only the platforms with a defensible workflow or evidence role.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Supervision ActDutch Government, DNB and AFM | Financial undertakings within the Act’s applicable prudential and conduct provisions | Sound governance, controlled business operations, risk management, internal controls, auditability and supervisory reporting. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
| Governance Requirements for BanksDNB | Banks operating within DNB’s supervisory perimeter | Management-body effectiveness, risk culture, internal governance, control functions, internal audit and accountable decision-making. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Audit universe, risk-based planning, RCM-linked testing, working papers, evidence, findings and follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Digital Operational Resilience ActEuropean Union and DNB | Financial entities and ICT third-party providers within DORA’s scope | ICT risk, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party registers, recovery, lessons learned and board oversight. |
Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Disruption reporting, escalation, investigation, corrective action, recovery tracking and closure evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| Outsourcing RequirementsDNB | Banks, payment institutions and electronic-money institutions within scope | Materiality, due diligence, contracting, monitoring, concentration risk, continuity, exit plans and audit access. |
Third-party risks, controls, assessments, treatments, approvals, KRIs and oversight reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
Source |
| GDPR Data Breach NotificationAP | Controllers and processors handling personal data within the GDPR’s scope | Breach registers, risk assessment, regulatory notification, affected-person communication, root-cause analysis and corrective action. |
Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. BoundaryNotification workflow and evidence can be configured. Submission to an authority requires an approved process or integration. |
Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
Brochure-Validated Capability
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.

Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.

Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.

Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
The platforms support governance workflows, accountability, evidence and reporting. They do not calculate regulatory capital or liquidity, replace technical cybersecurity monitoring, provide legal interpretation, issue external-audit opinions or automatically file statutory notifications unless an approved integration and process are configured.
Use one traceable workflow to translate requirements, manage execution and demonstrate oversight.
01

